TheCabinet.com
TheCabinet.com - Sign In    
TheCabinet.com
 
Invisible
  Horror Literature Forum
Transparent
Bullet Edgar Allan Poe Library
Bullet Horror Classics Library
Bullet Grimm Fairy Tales
Bullet Horror Literature Forum
Bullet Horror Literature Quotes

 
"American Psycho" (yeah, I know it's old, but...)  
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Horror Literature Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2000 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, am I totally alone in liking the book, "American Psycho"? The debate on this book is about a decade old, but I just got around to reading it over the summer and found that I liked it a lot more than I thought I would.
It drags in several places (kind of an understatement actually, unless you enjoy reading about expensive clothes and unaffordable restaurants), and the violent scenes are way beyond violent. But I feel I understand what Ellis was going for here in that , "plot-be-damned, critics-be-damned, people-with-weak-stomaches-be-double-damned, this is how a psychotic person would think and act!" I feel a certain amount of respect for the guy (Ellis, not Bateman)- he HAD to know that critics would bash this book unmercifully, but he wrote it anyway on his terms.
The repetition of the book is hard to accept at times, but there's also a certain element of humor to it. It helps to show how single-minded, greedy and selfish yuppies in the 80's (and the 90's and the 00's) were, taken to the extreme because of this guy's psychosis.
I've read that many women's groups boycotted this book because of it's extreme violence towards women, but, to be fair, there was extreme violence towards about every race, gender and age group there is!!
Sure, this book definitely isn't for your average Jackie Collins-reading housewife, but if one comes into the experience with a little forknowledge of what Bret Easton Ellis is going for in this book, it is, in my humble opinion, a good indictment on the materialistic, chauvinistic, and psychotic extreme a human being may be capable of.
Thank you for your time...

Submitted By: creeping death
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2000 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have yet to read the book but I have seen the movie (argh, I just hate having to say that) and I enjoyed it. The reason I have yet to read the book is because I need to get the movie out of my head, just so I can start the novel with a fresh mind.

As far as critics and activists bashing the book...hey, it's my belief that it ain't worth reading/watching if there are not several people out their who absolutely hate it. If it doesn't get under someones skin then what's the point Smile

Submitted By: Mr Self Affliction
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2000 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I, like Mr. SA, have only seen the movie, not read the book. But, based on the ideas presented in the movie, I can understand your comments about violence and humor.

I respect any author's decision to write a book on his own terms, and I often think violence is misinterpreted. People judge anything with violent content before even reading it (or watching it). I found the movie "American Psycho" to be a lot more insightful and fleshed out than any article I read on it gave it credit for. Sounds like the book is the same - Upon your recommendation, I may pick it up now!

Submitted By: Deena
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2000 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not to spoil the party but I'll just have to have my say here regarding AMERICAN PSYCHO.
I had a hard time with this book. Far from dynamic, it is a tedious read with characters you can't get to like one single bit. This was obviously an aim from the writer himself, to accentuate their soul-lessness, as it were, by their yuppie and asshole ways of handling themselves, their shallow values and general dislikable mannerism. What it amounts to, at least for me, is to sedate the reader so you don't get to feel a single thing for any one of them when they are submitted to the most hideous acts of torture I've certainly read. I saw what Brett Easton Ellis was aiming for in this novel, but as an entertaning work of fiction it plain sucked to me. I guess I'm used to books with plots and structure and build-ups, and this book had none of that. That's why I disliked it. I'd have to say; be in no hurry to start this one to anyone who hasn't. I do have another novel waiting by Ellis titled GLAMORAMA. I'm apprehensive about starting this one, but I guess I must soon since I got it from my aunt for Christmas and she's always asking whether I've read it yet whenever I see her.
It DOES look good, though. And from what some reviews hint at, it's to be a more literally inclined book that AMERICAN PSYCHO is.

Submitted By: Fenny
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2000 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the movie hasn't come your way yet (or has it?), but when it does please see it and tell me what you think. I really liked the movie but like I said, I have yet to read the book. I'm curious to see if you enjoy the movie over the book or maybe you'll hate it even more. But either way I need to know.

Submitted By: Mr Self Affliction
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2000 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay I have read the book and seen the movie and all I have to say is that they both sucked! Now I know u guys will get upset over this but it's the truth. I read the book before I saw the movie. I was hoping the movie would be better but it wasn't. The only redeeming thing about the movie was that the psycho guy was cute. I really hate to sound so superficial but that's how I feel about it. And besides it sorta made me sick.

Submitted By: Misty
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2000 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry to hear you feel that way Misty but we've all got our own opinions. I on the other hand felt the movie to be really well done and enjoyable.

Submitted By: Mr Self Affliction
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2000 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When the movie comes out on video I'll pick it up sometime or another. I'm curious myself for I believe that with the proper expertise it's possible to make a more streamlined story for this one on film than in its literary mode.

It wouldn't be the first time I've enjoyed film over book. THE EXORCIST springs easily to mind. Carpenter's version of THE THING made of John W. Campbell's WHO GOES THERE? is another.

Submitted By: Fenny
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2000 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another incident in which the movie was better than the book, although I'm sure not everyone will agree, was THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS. The book was indeed good but I felt that Hopkins and Foster captured something completly their own within the movie.

Submitted By: Mr Self Affliction
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2000 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"I felt that Hopkins and Foster captured something completely their own within the movie."

I heartily agree with the above statement, but I have to point out something that may not have occurred to a lot of us who saw the movie AFTER reading the book...

When I saw TSOTL for the first time, I brought along a friend who's never read any of Harris' work. I loved every minute of it, but when it was over, as my friend & I discussed the film, it became obvious that to him, "Buffalo Bill" was a completely opaque character. The next time I saw it, I tried to watch more objectively, and damn if I didn't realize I'd been unconsciously filling in some pretty big blanks in the film's non-Lecter/Starling character developments.

Sorry. In this case, the book is infinitely more satisfying than the film.

Later,

RomanyX

Submitted By: RomanyX
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2000 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, I read the book before I saw the movie. I loved the book but there were moments just like in Hannibal when Harris went a little overboard with the expositional stuff.

You're right, the audience didn't get a lot of Buffalo Bill (they did get enough to fulfill the two hours though) in the movie but I don't think that really matters because the movie and the book ended up doing two completely different things. Where as the book was definitely more plot driven, the movie was more character driven.

Submitted By: Mr Self Affliction
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Horror Literature Forum Search
 
Find:   Search:


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group



Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | RSS Feeds
Copyright ©1994-2013 by The Cabinet Productions, Inc.
If you have any questions, comments or corrections, please Contact Us.
Invisible Invisible Invisible Invisible